Future classic supercharged.
http://youtu.be/2KfMY96v_Gc
S4 vs.RS4
-
corrado917
- CVO Forums User
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:54 pm
- Location: wheeling
S4 vs.RS4
MKVI GTI
-
Phantom
- CVO Forums User
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:35 pm
Re: S4 vs.RS4
Wow! I want one!!
-
DasTeknoViking
- CVO Member
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Palatine
Re: S4 vs.RS4
Throw a B5 RS4 in there and a RS2, I have a feeling these new kids would have some issues with turbo power
-
got desl?
- CVO Director
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:36 pm
- Location: Mt Prospect, IL
Re: S4 vs.RS4
At the same time that has always been the case that forced induction will always beat out natural aspiration. It's extremely expensive and very difficult to get large numbers out of a naturally aspirated motor....take a look at the MK4/MK5 R32s.
Dawid
2010 VW Jetta TDi Cup Edition: 6 spd Lazer Blue A Class Champ (2011); C Class Champ (2012) #902
-
DasTeknoViking
- CVO Member
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Palatine
Re: S4 vs.RS4
He's done a comparison between the B5-8 in one of his web shows. He prefers the turbo car hands down because it's easy to drive fast.
Honestly I love NA but when the motor revs high and is in a light car. Not a fat pig of a car which is torque challenged like the 4.2 RS motor.
Honestly I love NA but when the motor revs high and is in a light car. Not a fat pig of a car which is torque challenged like the 4.2 RS motor.